Why would someone with over 10,000 miles of coastal cruising as well as a USCG 50 Ton Masters license pursue a US Sailing Coastal Passage Making certification? My best explanation is that my experience resembles a wheel of Swiss cheese - impressive looking, but full of holes. Take navigation for instance. Even after 18 years of experience cruising keel boats and passing the rigorous Coast Guard exam, I had a new experience in my Club Nautique Coastal Navigation class. As an exercise we plotted a course based only on a vessel log book. As with most textbook examples, it worked perfectly. I have to admit that my own log book is much too sparse to admit such perfection. Could I take what I had learned and apply it to a real life log which recorded heading and speed at regular intervals and whenever the vessel changed course?
Cover of Schooner Runnymede's Log Book |
What type of vessel was she? There is a register of the British Merchant Navy for 1886 showing two schooners named Runnymede out of St John's. On was of 53 tons and one was of 57 tons. Neither was owned by Nathaniel Roberts. Looking at modern schooners and seeing that the highest speed he recorded in her log was 8 knots, I estimate her to have been about 80 ft overall with a 50 foot waterline. I will try to find more definitive info when I visit St John's this summer.
Here is the first page of the log describing the first day as he sailed out from St John's harbor. Consulting an almanac for that date obtained from the Google library, we can see that he left with the tide. This was wise as St John's harbor is long and narrow with step hills on either side. I don't know if British practice followed the American rules that gave sailors the Sabbath off except for when leaving or arriving at port, but perhaps not coincidentally July 11, 1886 was a Sunday.
There were of course other aspects of 18th century usage that raised questions:
1: What did the column headings mean? 'H' meant hour, 'K' meant speed in knots, 'HK' meant additional half knot, 'Courses' probably meant course to steer given to the helmsman, although usage could vary, 'Winds' meant directions from which the wind blew and its strength (not strictly adhering to the Beaufort scale), 'Leeway' meant number of points course made good differed from the steered course, and 'Remarks' were just free form text.
Pages for July 11 and 12 1886 |
3: Are the bearings magnetic or true? Today, purists insist that we plot our courses and fill our log books with true bearings. In practice, small vessels usually use magnetic bearings. I plotted this course both ways and found no bearings that were impossible either way. With no hard evidence to go on, I chose to interpret his bearings as magnetic.
32 Points of the Compass |
5: How do we convert his magnetic bearings to true so we can plot his courses? The Newfoundland Almanac for 1886 gives the variation as 32 degrees and 30 seconds (p. 5). Given the degrees magnetic, all navigators know that since "Timid Virgins Make Dull Companions--Add West" means we should subtract the West variation to correct his magnetic bearings to true.
6: How did he do his 'accounting' or what we call dead reckoning? I can't be sure, but my go in assumption is that he recorded his speed for every two hour period and whenever he changed course.
7: How did he establish his true position? In the 1829 edition of The London Encyclopedia, the Navigation entry says that navigators are adept at determining the distance to landmarks and thus consider the bearing and distance to a landmark an accurate fix.
8: Did he use celestial navigation? We have one entry where he listed one latitude 'on account' (by dead reckoning) and another latitude 'by observation' (noon sighting.) Their distance apart of six miles is considered acceptable.
9: Besides navigation information, what do the Remarks tell us? I interpret the liberal sprinkling of boiler plate like "crew employed as duty required" and "pumps attended to" as an indication that his log was subject to review by the ship's owners.
I decided that my first step was to transcribe the log as best I could to make it more easily accessible
Transcription of Pages for July 11 and 12 1886 |
First Sighting in iNavX |
Route of July 1886 in iNavX |
My third step was to create a route in iNavX linking all of the waypoints.The tool calculates all the individual bearings and distances of the legs of the trip. In addition it shows the total distance of 207 nautical. It took the Runnymede just about a week to make the 207 mile trip we see in this overview. iNavX also allows exporting the route to a KML file readable by Google Earth.
Chart of Route in July 1886in iNavX |
My fourth step was to follow the bi-hourly entries line by line to recreate an 'account' or as we call it, a dead reckoning. To date, this effort has been a frustration. To take an obvious example, notice the time gap between the last entry for July 11 and the first entry for July 12. There appear to be no entries for a twenty four hour period. In addition, there are times when he recorded lite winds and yet showed three knot speeds. I am incredulous that his 18th century schooner was capable of making three knots in lite winds. I have tried to recreate the dead reckoning of each leg of this trip as well as the return voyage he made in August of the same year. So far, no luck. I hope his log keeping was not as sparse as my own.
So, what is the net of all this effort?
1: First it is a fascinating exercise in navigation putting to use some of my training.
2: Second, it has pulled me into my wife's family history and piqued our interest in taking Virago from Mane to St John's. To that end, I am planning a cruise from Portland, Maine to St John's Newfoundland and back to Bar Harbor, Maine this summer. On the leg from Burin to St John's I will make an effort to recreate at least some of Captain Roberts' sightings.
3: Third, it has made me more conscious of how valuable a well kept log might be in the future. I intend to be more diligent in my log keeping on any upcoming trip.
Google Earth View of Upcoming Trip in a KML File. |
No comments:
Post a Comment